Section 1

Phased CIP → RIP → Flotation Strategy

Development pathway for a 3.0 g/t historical tailings resource in a $4,300+/oz gold price environment, structured to maximize NPV while minimizing upfront capital and risk.

One-Page Executive Summary

With gold above $4,300/oz, the priority shifts from designing the perfect flowsheet to identifying the fastest, lowest-CAPEX path to cash flow, then using internal capital to fund metallurgical upgrades.

Phased development arc:

Phase 1: Direct CIP

Not optimal long-term, but the cheapest and fastest to build and commission, and extremely profitable at current gold prices even at 40–55% recovery.

Phase 2: CIP + RIP

RIP replaces carbon with resin, solving preg-robbing, fouling, and kinetic limitations, lifting recovery to ~65–75% while reusing CIP infrastructure.

Phase 3: Flotation + Concentrate Leach

Flotation concentrates sulphides into 5–15% of mass, sends preg-robbing carbon to tails, shrinks cyanide footprint, and pushes recovery to 80–85%+.

Section 2

Slide-Deck Narrative (CIP → RIP → Flotation)

Flowsheet Options

Why Start with CIP?

Phased Strategy & Capital

Section 3

Technical Appendix (Summary)

Direct CIP exhibits the highest reagent consumption, TSF load, and environmental liability. CIP + RIP reduces metallurgical risk and improves recovery but does not change the mass balance. Flotation + Concentrate Leach delivers the highest recovery, lowest reagent consumption per tonne, and the smallest long-term ESG footprint.

Overall, the phased pathway is intentionally designed: CIP is the bridge, RIP is the upgrade, and flotation is the destination.